Leo07
06-09 01:50 PM
Any attorneys opinion? or people who were in similar situation?
remember, it's not my entire company being sold to another company. Only a fraction of company( a division) is being sold along with the assets( people,stuff etc).
remember, it's not my entire company being sold to another company. Only a fraction of company( a division) is being sold along with the assets( people,stuff etc).
wallpaper injection of evacizumab
fasterthanlight�
05-19 05:43 PM
Added a pink thing.
rbalaji5
04-02 08:55 PM
Thank you Sir.
2011 intravitreal evacizumab
permfiling
09-28 12:16 AM
I gave FP 2 weeks ahead of the scheduled date. They only checked whether I have a FP notice.
I got a biometrics notice which is 22 days from today. Is there a way to prephone the appointment or I can just go as you guys did
I got a biometrics notice which is 22 days from today. Is there a way to prephone the appointment or I can just go as you guys did
more...
mzafar125
11-12 10:19 AM
Folks,
Is there a time limit to transfer a H1-B visa ? If the previous company revokes the H1-B visa how long do we have or is the H1-B canceled at that point ? Please let me know at your earliest.
-Mehmood
Is there a time limit to transfer a H1-B visa ? If the previous company revokes the H1-B visa how long do we have or is the H1-B canceled at that point ? Please let me know at your earliest.
-Mehmood
dohko
01-11 10:04 PM
I'm not from India. I'm from ROW.
more...
superdude
07-19 12:46 AM
Hi Friends,
I just want to say, I just contributed $100 (Confirmation Number: 2XJ23352J19006734) and this is my first contribution ever and have done it just for IV. And am very proud about this.
I came to know about IV, 2 weeks ago when I heard of the flower campaign from my friend . We are very fortunate to have IV with us and thousands of users in IV helping each other.
I am sure with out IV initiative , it would have been very hard to achieve what we got now. Thousands of people benefited as per yesterdays USCIS bulletin and thousands of people visiting IV every day for help. So please, lets show our gratitude to IV by contributing either one time payment or recurring. If atleast who ever benefited by July 17th bulletin contributes to IV, we can easily make $100k in July.
Lets celebrate our success by contrubuting to IV and making July2007 as the highest contributed month in IV history.
If I can do it, you can do it .
Thanks
WE already have thread for this. Pls visit http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10510
I just want to say, I just contributed $100 (Confirmation Number: 2XJ23352J19006734) and this is my first contribution ever and have done it just for IV. And am very proud about this.
I came to know about IV, 2 weeks ago when I heard of the flower campaign from my friend . We are very fortunate to have IV with us and thousands of users in IV helping each other.
I am sure with out IV initiative , it would have been very hard to achieve what we got now. Thousands of people benefited as per yesterdays USCIS bulletin and thousands of people visiting IV every day for help. So please, lets show our gratitude to IV by contributing either one time payment or recurring. If atleast who ever benefited by July 17th bulletin contributes to IV, we can easily make $100k in July.
Lets celebrate our success by contrubuting to IV and making July2007 as the highest contributed month in IV history.
If I can do it, you can do it .
Thanks
WE already have thread for this. Pls visit http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10510
2010 injections of evacizumab.
calaway42
10-06 01:07 AM
tahnx and sorry :)
more...
deecha
08-18 02:23 PM
Hi
I was not so so keen until this matter was resolved..BUT my GC got approved.
I am separated from spouse. But when I filed 485, I was "married" because our relationship was still unstable.
Now QUITE FRANKLY I am NOT sure what's going to happen ahead.Dont ask me why. This whole uncertainty depressed me . If I re-unite and my wife is in India and I am on GC HOW do I call her here ?
If I divorce and re-marry how do I get my new wife here.
In any case , I dont plan on getting more than 1 person so pl dont look at it from a gamers view.
Thanks for ur help
RR
It's not my intention to encourage marital discord. Having said that there are a couple options for you:
(a) If you re-unite and reconcile with your wife, you can file a follow-to-join petition, since you were married before you got your GC. She will get her GC fairly fast and be able to enter as an immigrant.
(b) If you get divorced and get re-married, you're out of luck. You would have to file a Family based I-140 petition (F2A, I think) and it takes about 5-6 years to get something like that approved. In the meantime if you want her to come to the USA, she will have to come on a dual-intent visa such as H1B. The consulate will not give her an ordinary visa. Of course, you can claim citizenship and "upgrade" your petition.
I am not a lawyer and this not legal advice. Please consult an attorney for your specific case.
I was not so so keen until this matter was resolved..BUT my GC got approved.
I am separated from spouse. But when I filed 485, I was "married" because our relationship was still unstable.
Now QUITE FRANKLY I am NOT sure what's going to happen ahead.Dont ask me why. This whole uncertainty depressed me . If I re-unite and my wife is in India and I am on GC HOW do I call her here ?
If I divorce and re-marry how do I get my new wife here.
In any case , I dont plan on getting more than 1 person so pl dont look at it from a gamers view.
Thanks for ur help
RR
It's not my intention to encourage marital discord. Having said that there are a couple options for you:
(a) If you re-unite and reconcile with your wife, you can file a follow-to-join petition, since you were married before you got your GC. She will get her GC fairly fast and be able to enter as an immigrant.
(b) If you get divorced and get re-married, you're out of luck. You would have to file a Family based I-140 petition (F2A, I think) and it takes about 5-6 years to get something like that approved. In the meantime if you want her to come to the USA, she will have to come on a dual-intent visa such as H1B. The consulate will not give her an ordinary visa. Of course, you can claim citizenship and "upgrade" your petition.
I am not a lawyer and this not legal advice. Please consult an attorney for your specific case.
hair Avastin may work if repeated
thesparky007
04-24 05:36 PM
i like all them
good job butters
good job butters
more...
udayak
08-27 05:15 PM
Given the current circumstances, it will take years for I-485 to be
process for 02-july filers.
One of the provisions of AC-21 is that the job is in same or similar
occupation. If a person changes his functional role(Ex: IT->marketing,
IT->Non-IT, IT->Sales etc.), how is AC-21 protoability applied ?
So, in this case, can a new labor/I-140 be applied for the NEW
position ? Can this I-140 be used to replace the existing I-140
with USCIS ? Can I-485 continue in this case ?
Thanks
process for 02-july filers.
One of the provisions of AC-21 is that the job is in same or similar
occupation. If a person changes his functional role(Ex: IT->marketing,
IT->Non-IT, IT->Sales etc.), how is AC-21 protoability applied ?
So, in this case, can a new labor/I-140 be applied for the NEW
position ? Can this I-140 be used to replace the existing I-140
with USCIS ? Can I-485 continue in this case ?
Thanks
hot Both Lucentis and Avastin …
sanz
04-05 10:50 PM
why is the grass always green on the other side :D
more...
house Ovarian cancer bibf versus avastin. avastin how many injectios you need
gcpradeep
04-06 09:38 PM
Here is a link from C-SPAN that summarizes Hagel/Martinez Ammendment
http://www.c-span.org/pdf/Hagel_Martinez.pdf
http://www.c-span.org/pdf/Hagel_Martinez.pdf
tattoo Avastin Side Effects | eye
learning01
04-13 09:42 PM
It is a sophisticated game and the stakes are huge. I am reminded of a game in a James Bond movie, in which 007 Roger Moore plays against a villain in a high tech game. Imagine something like that but a thousand times more intense. The existing immigration policy from 1965 is crafted by none other than Sen.Ted Kennedy; yes, the present MA Senator. I have high hopes that he and the Dems will also get it right this time on Apr 24th.
I personally suspect the present day republicans except President G.W.Bush. If a CIL passes, the republicans are to gain more and Americans will gain the most. Period.
These attitudes of self doesn't affect me in my objective and scientific thinking and analysis of issues and my posts, which are done on a case by case basis.
***** vs. *****. Politics is really nasty.
I personally suspect the present day republicans except President G.W.Bush. If a CIL passes, the republicans are to gain more and Americans will gain the most. Period.
These attitudes of self doesn't affect me in my objective and scientific thinking and analysis of issues and my posts, which are done on a case by case basis.
***** vs. *****. Politics is really nasty.
more...
pictures Intraviteral injections of
Blog Feeds
05-27 12:40 PM
Two little-known types of immigrant visas are the T and the U visas. The T visa is for people innocently involved in human trafficking, and the U visa is for victims of crime. The U visa's basic purpose is to make it easier for police to prosecute those who commit violence.
Both types of visas were discussed in a recent Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/052010dnmetuvisa.8c47617.html) article. Here are excerpts from the article, beginning with a discussion of the U visa:
The visas began flowing only 18 months ago and the majority have gone to domestic violence victims, say officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, up to 10,000 such visas are authorized annually. Illegal immigrants may receive such visas if they've suffered "substantial" physical or mental abuse from criminal activity and, among other things, a law enforcement agency certifies they have information on criminal activity. The visa can lead to permanent legal residency status.
The issuing of U visas comes at a tense time in the national immigration debate, amid a polarizing crackdown and potentially broader policing powers against immigrants in Arizona. And it illuminates a prickly point of justice: Should the federal government give illegal immigrants special treatment for a societal good such as fighting violent crime?
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act created both the U visa and the T visa. They're near the end of a complex network of visas, A through V.
T visas, for those involved in human trafficking, began flowing in 2002, but the flow of U visas was delayed as regulations on issuance were hammered out. In the last three full fiscal years, only about 250 to 300 T visas have been approved of the maximum annual allotment of 5,000.
In the last fiscal year, ending in September 2009, the federal government authorized 5,825 U visas. In the first five months of this fiscal year, nearly 5,000 such visas were given. There are about 6,600 visa applications pending, and the 10,000 allotment is expected to be reached as early as next month, said Maria Elena Garcia Upson, a spokeswoman for the immigration agency.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/9QAoUnEU-G4/)
Both types of visas were discussed in a recent Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/052010dnmetuvisa.8c47617.html) article. Here are excerpts from the article, beginning with a discussion of the U visa:
The visas began flowing only 18 months ago and the majority have gone to domestic violence victims, say officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, up to 10,000 such visas are authorized annually. Illegal immigrants may receive such visas if they've suffered "substantial" physical or mental abuse from criminal activity and, among other things, a law enforcement agency certifies they have information on criminal activity. The visa can lead to permanent legal residency status.
The issuing of U visas comes at a tense time in the national immigration debate, amid a polarizing crackdown and potentially broader policing powers against immigrants in Arizona. And it illuminates a prickly point of justice: Should the federal government give illegal immigrants special treatment for a societal good such as fighting violent crime?
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act created both the U visa and the T visa. They're near the end of a complex network of visas, A through V.
T visas, for those involved in human trafficking, began flowing in 2002, but the flow of U visas was delayed as regulations on issuance were hammered out. In the last three full fiscal years, only about 250 to 300 T visas have been approved of the maximum annual allotment of 5,000.
In the last fiscal year, ending in September 2009, the federal government authorized 5,825 U visas. In the first five months of this fiscal year, nearly 5,000 such visas were given. There are about 6,600 visa applications pending, and the 10,000 allotment is expected to be reached as early as next month, said Maria Elena Garcia Upson, a spokeswoman for the immigration agency.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/9QAoUnEU-G4/)
dresses avasti carboplatin taxol and avastin in metastatic breast cancer
Blog Feeds
03-26 08:40 AM
Dallas-Fort Worth Immigration Lawyer Has Just Posted the Following:
For the second time, a federal judge has declared a Farmers Branch ordinance banning illegal immigrants from renting in the city to be unconstitutional. Here are excerpts from a Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-FBsuit_25met.ART.Central.Edition1.4c77c2c.html) article reporting this decision:
U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle of Dallas ruled Wednesday that the ordinance was an attempt to enforce U.S. immigration laws – something the judge said only the federal government can do.
The judge also issued a permanent injunction to stop Farmers Branch from enforcing Ordinance 2952.
Mayor Tim O'Hare, the driving force behind the ordinances, said he wants to appeal.
"The American people are tired of judges legislating from the bench," he said. "This decision is not unexpected but welcomed, because it allows us to get closer to this ordinance becoming reality."
But O'Hare said the City Council would have to vote on whether to continue a fight that has cost the city nearly $3.2 million since September 2006. And the city may need to spend an additional $623,000 in legal fees in the year ahead, city finance director Charles Cox said Wednesday.
About one-quarter of the estimated 30,000 people who live in Farmers Branch were born outside the United States. About 47 percent of the city's population is Hispanic.
In the past four years, the city has proposed a series of ordinances that would make it illegal for landlords to rent to illegal immigrants. A version approved by the council in 2006 was repealed in early 2007 to make way for another ordinance.
That ordinance, No. 2903, was approved by two-thirds of voters in 2007 but later declared unconstitutional by U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay. The city abandoned an appeal of that ordinance in favor of Ordinance 2952. No. 2952 added all rental units, including houses, to the ban on renting to illegal immigrants.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/another-judge-rules-farmers-branch-rental-ban-is-unconstitutional.php)
For the second time, a federal judge has declared a Farmers Branch ordinance banning illegal immigrants from renting in the city to be unconstitutional. Here are excerpts from a Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-FBsuit_25met.ART.Central.Edition1.4c77c2c.html) article reporting this decision:
U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle of Dallas ruled Wednesday that the ordinance was an attempt to enforce U.S. immigration laws – something the judge said only the federal government can do.
The judge also issued a permanent injunction to stop Farmers Branch from enforcing Ordinance 2952.
Mayor Tim O'Hare, the driving force behind the ordinances, said he wants to appeal.
"The American people are tired of judges legislating from the bench," he said. "This decision is not unexpected but welcomed, because it allows us to get closer to this ordinance becoming reality."
But O'Hare said the City Council would have to vote on whether to continue a fight that has cost the city nearly $3.2 million since September 2006. And the city may need to spend an additional $623,000 in legal fees in the year ahead, city finance director Charles Cox said Wednesday.
About one-quarter of the estimated 30,000 people who live in Farmers Branch were born outside the United States. About 47 percent of the city's population is Hispanic.
In the past four years, the city has proposed a series of ordinances that would make it illegal for landlords to rent to illegal immigrants. A version approved by the council in 2006 was repealed in early 2007 to make way for another ordinance.
That ordinance, No. 2903, was approved by two-thirds of voters in 2007 but later declared unconstitutional by U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay. The city abandoned an appeal of that ordinance in favor of Ordinance 2952. No. 2952 added all rental units, including houses, to the ban on renting to illegal immigrants.
More... (http://dfwimmigrationlaw.clarislaw.com/immigration-news/another-judge-rules-farmers-branch-rental-ban-is-unconstitutional.php)
more...
makeup Avastin middot; Eyelid Surgery
monkeyman
08-30 02:11 PM
I applied my 485 as a single on July 17th.
I got married and then applied my spouse's on Aug 16th.
Since I am married now, will that cause my application to get rejected as I applied as Single.
I am not sure how would this be handled at USCIS end ?
Any idea ?
Should not have any impact - your spouse will receive a conditional GC if her GC comes within two years of your marriage. You shall (as a primary member) receive a 10 year GC. You will need to file for your wife again to remove the conditions after completing two years of your marriage. No big deal. Just chill and attend the rally. No one can tell you how long will it take it to get your actual GC though.
I got married and then applied my spouse's on Aug 16th.
Since I am married now, will that cause my application to get rejected as I applied as Single.
I am not sure how would this be handled at USCIS end ?
Any idea ?
Should not have any impact - your spouse will receive a conditional GC if her GC comes within two years of your marriage. You shall (as a primary member) receive a 10 year GC. You will need to file for your wife again to remove the conditions after completing two years of your marriage. No big deal. Just chill and attend the rally. No one can tell you how long will it take it to get your actual GC though.
girlfriend Cancer: Bevacizumab (Avastin)
ben212_76
01-18 12:32 PM
I have a similar case, mentioned above.
Any information on this will be very helpful.
Any information on this will be very helpful.
hairstyles carboplatin taxol and avastin in metastatic breast cancer avasti
agiridhar
05-14 12:52 PM
Anti trust lawsuits are brought about when it is found that a company or institution is using it's power of monopoly to bring in anti-competitive measures. In this case, which institution is using it's monopoly - the government?
USCIS (erst while INS) I guess...
USCIS (erst while INS) I guess...
gcformewhen
09-10 05:02 PM
Hi,
I got laidoff recently. My company is going to withdraw H1b. I have my 140 approved from same company and my 485 pending. I have EAD and never used and working on H1B for the same company. I was working for the same company which processed my H1B.
If H1B is withdrawn is there going to be any effect on my 485? like any possibility of RFE on 485 for EVL? My employer said they will not withdraw or revoke 140.
How long will it take to withdraw H1B?
your inputs are much appreciated.
Thanks
I got laidoff recently. My company is going to withdraw H1b. I have my 140 approved from same company and my 485 pending. I have EAD and never used and working on H1B for the same company. I was working for the same company which processed my H1B.
If H1B is withdrawn is there going to be any effect on my 485? like any possibility of RFE on 485 for EVL? My employer said they will not withdraw or revoke 140.
How long will it take to withdraw H1B?
your inputs are much appreciated.
Thanks
glus
06-02 09:35 AM
Dear Friends,
I am some one might have gone through this situation. I tried to look for old post but couldn't find it.. Anyways
I have an Advance payrol, I went for Stamping at Chennai US counslate. They sent for Name check verification(Security Clearence). I have been living in US since 2000 and travelled back and forth many times and got visa stamped many times and they kept my passport and upon mailing they will send my passport.
My question is Can I use Advance Payrol while my H1B stamping case is sent for Name verification(security Clearence)..Please let me know any one has use AP in this case
Your response would be highly appritated
Thanks
Farooq
yes, you can travel if you have passport.
I am some one might have gone through this situation. I tried to look for old post but couldn't find it.. Anyways
I have an Advance payrol, I went for Stamping at Chennai US counslate. They sent for Name check verification(Security Clearence). I have been living in US since 2000 and travelled back and forth many times and got visa stamped many times and they kept my passport and upon mailing they will send my passport.
My question is Can I use Advance Payrol while my H1B stamping case is sent for Name verification(security Clearence)..Please let me know any one has use AP in this case
Your response would be highly appritated
Thanks
Farooq
yes, you can travel if you have passport.
No comments:
Post a Comment